Commissioners of energy across the 36 states on Wednesday disclosed their readiness to meet with power distributors to negotiate electricity tariffs that are reflective and not burdensome on residents of the states.

This follows the recent cut in electricity tariff for Band A customers from N209/kWh to N160/kWh by the Enugu Electricity Regulatory Commission, and the resistance that greeted the development by both power generation and distribution companies.

However, the power distribution companies have kicked against any form of negotiations with states on power tariffs, stressing that the move by the state governments might kill the power sector if care is not taken.

The EERC, on its part, has continued to defend its position and is not ready to give in to the demands of power generators and distributors, as the states defended their decision to regulate the power sector in their various jurisdictions.

Recently, the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission disclosed that seven states now control their electricity markets in accordance with the Electricity Act 2023. The states are Enugu, Ondo, Ekiti, Imo, Oyo, Edo, and Kogi. Other states, including Lagos, Ogun, Niger, and Plateau, are expected to complete their transitions between now and September.

Speaking with The PUNCH on Wednesday, the Chairman, Forum of Commissioners of Power and Energy in Nigeria, who doubles as the Commissioner of Power and Renewable Energy for Cross River State, Prince Eka Williams, stated that though some states might have the wherewithal to subsidise the power supply of their residents, the aim of state governments was mainly to ensure adequate power supply in their states.

He insisted that the Electricity Act 2023 had empowered the states to regulate the sector in their domains, and resisted attempts to counter this development.

“Without any equivocation, each State Electricity Regulator is uniquely positioned to determine and implement appropriate electricity tariffs that are fair to customers and at the same time, catalyse investments within their electricity markets, depending on their perculiar electricity market dynamics, licensee cost structures, consumer needs, and regulatory assessments,” he stated.

Asked whether state governments were ready to bear the burden of electricity subsidies, as declared by the power minister following the slash in tariffs by Enugu state, Williams replied, “Well, it’s not something I want to unilaterally agree or disagree with. The power sector is currently being tested, and there’s a lot of experimentation going on. There’s no one-size-fits-all approach.

“What’s important is that all stakeholders sit at the table to discuss these issues, taking into account the unique circumstances of each state. States operate differently. So, any governor who feels inclined can say, ‘I’m ready to shoulder this responsibility.’

“I believe what the minister is suggesting is that states can and should have more input in shaping the electricity conversation. But it’s still an ongoing dialogue. It’s not something you can pin down as a definitive statement, it requires extensive consultation and engagement.”

Also, in a statement on Wednesday, the Forum of State Commissioners of Power and Energy said the claims by the power generation companies were unfounded, allaying fears that the decision of Enugu to reduce the tariff of Band A would negatively impact its revenue streams.

The forum, speaking on behalf of the 36 states, said it was ready to negotiate with the Discos operating in their states. However, power distributors said that they were not ready for any negotiation with the states, who they alleged were trying to sabotage the successes recorded in power generation lately.

Recall that states like Lagos, Ondo and Plateau have indicated their interest in slashing tariffs. But the Enugu power regulator insisted that there was no point retaining the Band A tariff at N209/kWh, defending its decision scheduled to take effect from August 1.

Speaking on behalf of the states, the forum Chairman, Williams, and Secretary, Omale Omale, noted that the Enugu government’s policy did not extend to the wholesale market where Gencos operate.

The forum explained that the downward reduction in electricity tariffs by the Enugu Electricity Regulatory Commission was duly aligned with the provisions of the Electricity Act 2023.

The forum also said the new tariff by the Enugu Electricity Regulatory Commission followed a comprehensive and meticulous review process of thorough examination of the capital and operational expenditures and assumptions of MainPower Electricity Distribution Company operating in the state.

“The Enugu Electricity Regulatory Commission carried out a rigorous assessment of MainPower’s existing customer tariffs classification and regulatory assets base of N4.00 kWh on Band A feeders. The EERC, acting within the ambit of its regulatory provisions, has set tariffs approximately based on its findings, aiming for a cost-reflective and fair market for consumers and operators alike,“ the statement read in parts.

While stating that Enugu State based its regulatory findings and specific market conditions on the downward tariff adjustment, the forum noted that this did not amount to other states applying the same approach.

“For instance, several states, Ekiti, Ondo states, and others have issued tariff orders maintaining the present MYTO tariffs,” it stated. FOCPEN assured investors and the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry that states did not arbitrarily reduce tariffs or depend on unsustainable electricity subsidies by the Federal Government.

“On the contrary, states are resolute in their call for the removal of untargeted and opaque federal subsidies, advocating instead for the establishment of truly cost-reflective subnational and wholesale electricity markets. States, including Enugu, are sectors where electricity tariffs accurately reflect the cost of service delivery, thereby encouraging investment and efficiency,” the group added.